
External
Constitutional Law
Constitutional law is a branch of law that deals with the interpretation and application of a country's constitution. A constitution serves as the supreme law of the land, setting out the fundamental principles, structure of government, and rights of individuals within a nation. Constitutional law governs the relationships between different branches of government, as well as the rights and duties of citizens.
- Author
- Lumen Learning
- Publisher
- Lumen Learning
- Source
- LibreTexts
- License
- CC0 / Public domain
- Language
- EN
- Category
- Business Administration
Contents· 102 sections
- 01: Historical perspective of the Constitution
- 1.01: The Constitution of the United States
- 1.02: The Federalist Papers
- 1.03: Marbury v. Madison
- 02: First Amendment- Freedom of religion freedom to assembly freedom of speech free press prior restraint
- 2.01: Free Press- Near v. Minnesota 283 U.S. 697 (1931)
- 2.02: Free Press- New York Times Co. v. United States 403 U.S. 713 (1971)
- 2.03: Free Press- Simon and Schuster Inc. v. Members of N. Y. State Crime Victims Bd. 502 U.S. 105 (1991)
- 2.04: Free Press- In Re- Grand Jury Subpoena Judith Miller 397 F.3d 964 (D.C. Cir. 2005)
- 2.05: Free Press- Beard v. Banks 548 U.S. 521 (2006)
- 2.06: Free Press- Pell v. Procunier 417 U.S. 817 (1974)
- 2.07: Freedom of Religion- Cooper v. Pate
- 2.08: Freedom of Religion- OLone v. Estate of Shabazz 482 U.S. 342 (1987)
- 2.09: Freedom of Religion- McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Ky.
- 2.10: Freedom to Assembly- Brandenburg v. Ohio 395 U.S. 444 (1969)
- 2.11: Freedom of Assembly- National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie 432 U.S. 43 (1977)
- 2.12: Freedom of Speech- Schenck v. United States 249 U.S. 47 (1919)
- 2.13: Freedom of Speech- Dennis v. United States 341 U.S. 494 (1951)
- 2.14: Freedom of Speech- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District 393 U.S. 503 (1969)
- 03: Second Amendment- Regulations
- 3.01: Military Service- United States v. Cruikshank 92 U.S. 542 (1875)
- 3.02: Military Service- United States v. Miller 307 U.S. 174 (1939)
- 3.03: Military Service- District of Columbia v. Heller 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Annotate this Case
- 3.04: Federal Regulations v. State Regulations- Presser v. Illinois 116 U.S. 252 (1886)
- 3.05: Federal Regulation v. State Regulation- McDonald v. Chicago 561 U.S. 742 (2010)
- 04: Fourth Amendment and the Exclusionary Rule
- 4.01: Weeks v. United States 232 U.S. 383 (1914)
- 4.02: Mapp v. Ohio 367 U.S. 643 (1961) Annotate this Case
- 4.03: Wolf v. Colorado 338 U.S. 25 (1949)
- 4.04: Schmerber v. California 384 U.S. 757 (1966)
- 4.05: Sibron v. New York 392 U.S. 40 (1968)
- 4.06: Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)
- 4.07: Utah v. Strieff 579 US (2016)
- 4.08: Carroll v. United States 267 U.S. 132 (1925)
- 05: Exceptions to the Fourth Amendment
- 5.01: US v. Jones 565 US (2012)
- 5.02: Carroll v. United States 267 U.S. 132 (1925)
- 5.03: Kyllo v. United States 533 U.S. 27 (2001)
- 5.04: Brendlin v. California 551 U.S. 249 (2007)
- 5.05: Rodriguez v. US 575 US (2015)
- 5.06: US v. Leon 468 US 897 (1984)
- 5.07: Amos v. United States 255 U.S. 313 (1921)
- 5.08: Johnson v. United States 333 U.S. 10 (1948) Annotate this Case
- 5.09: Bumper v. North Carolina 391 US 543 (1968)
- 5.10: Chimel v. California 395 US 752 (1969)
- 5.11: New York v. Belton 453 U.S. 454 (1981)
- 5.12: Florida v. Riley 488 US 445 (1989)
- 5.13: Terry v. Ohio 392 US 1 (1968)
- 5.14: Hester v. United States 413 US 266 (1973)
- 5.15: Arizona v. Gant 556 U.S. 332 (2009)
- 06: Wiretapping- What is permissible
- 6.01: Olmstead v. United Stated 277 US 438 (1928)
- 6.02: Berger v. NY 388 US 41 (1967)
- 6.03: Katz v. United states 389 US 347 (1967)
- 6.04: Clapper v. Amnesty Intl USA 568 US (2013)
- 07: Self Incrimination and the 5th amendment
- 7.01: Bram v. US 168 US 532 (1897)
- 7.02: Spano v. NY 360 US 315 (1959)
- 7.03: Frazier v. Cupp 394 US 731 (1969)
- 7.04: Arizona v. Fulminante 499 US 279 (1991)
- 7.05: Berghuis v. Thompkins 560 U.S. 370 (2010)
- 7.06: Salinas v. Texas 570 US (2013)
- 7.07: Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (1966)
- 7.08: Schmerber v. California 384 US 757 (1966)
- 08: 6th amendment What is effective representation
- 8.01: Powell v. Alabama 287 US 45 (1932)
- 8.02: Gideon v. Wainwright 372 US 335 (1963)
- 8.03: Texas v. Cobb 532 US 162 (2001)
- 8.04: Escobedo v. Illinois 378 US 478 (1964)
- 8.05: Montejo v. Louisiana 556 US 778 (2009)
- 09: Discrimination in the Constitution Due Process and the 14th Amendment
- 9.01: Dred Scott v. Sandford 60 US 393 (1856)
- 9.02: Plessy v. Ferguson 163 US 537 (1896)
- 9.03: Korematsu v. US 323 US 214 (1944)
- 9.04: Brown v. Board of Ed 347 US 483 (1954
- 9.05: Loving v. Virginia 388 US 1 (1967)
- 9.06: Roe v. Wade 410 US 113 (1973)
- 9.07: Obergefell v. Hodges 576 US (2015)
- 10: Punishment and the 8th amendment- What constitutes cruel and unusual punishment
- 10.01: Ex Parte Hull 312 US 546 (1941)
- 10.02: Furman v. Georgia 408 US 238 (1972)
- 10.03: Coker v. Georgia 433 US 584 (1977)
- 10.04: Kennedy v. Louisana 554 US 407 (2008)
- 10.05: Miller v. Alabama 567 US (2012)
- 10.06: Ex Parte Hull 312 US 546 (1941)
- 10.07: In Re Bonner 151 US 242 (1894)
- 10.08: 11.7-
- 10.09: Ruffin v. Commmonwealth 62 Va 790 (1871)
- 10.10: Price v. Johnston 334 US 266 (1948)
- 11: Trial Rights- Understanding the rights of a defendant
- 11.01: Batson v. Kentucky 476 US 79 (1986)
- 11.02: Griffin v. California 380 US 609(1965)
- 11.03: In re Gault 387 U.S. 1 (1967
- 11.04: Crawford v. Washington 541 US 36 (2004)
- 11.05: Maryland v. Craig 497 US 836 (1990)
- 11.06: Waller v. Georgia 467 US 39 (1984)
- 11.07: Estes v. Texas 381 US 532 (1965)
- 12: Social Media and the Constitution- Exploring the limitations
- 12.01: Elonis v. US 575 US (2015)
- 12.02: Riley v. California 573 US (2014)
- 12.03: US v. Lambis SDNY 7
- 12.3.01: US v. Lambis SDNY 7 2016.not found