Thư viện Trường Đại học Phú Xuân
Constitutional Law

Nguồn ngoài

Constitutional Law

Constitutional law is a branch of law that deals with the interpretation and application of a country's constitution. A constitution serves as the supreme law of the land, setting out the fundamental principles, structure of government, and rights of individuals within a nation. Constitutional law governs the relationships between different branches of government, as well as the rights and duties of citizens.

Tác giả
Lumen Learning
Nhà xuất bản
Lumen Learning
Nguồn
LibreTexts
Giấy phép
CC0 / Public domain
Ngôn ngữ
EN
Danh mục
Quản trị kinh doanh
Mục lục· 102 mục
  1. 01: Historical perspective of the Constitution
  2. 1.01: The Constitution of the United States
  3. 1.02: The Federalist Papers
  4. 1.03: Marbury v. Madison
  5. 02: First Amendment- Freedom of religion freedom to assembly freedom of speech free press prior restraint
  6. 2.01: Free Press- Near v. Minnesota 283 U.S. 697 (1931)
  7. 2.02: Free Press- New York Times Co. v. United States 403 U.S. 713 (1971)
  8. 2.03: Free Press- Simon and Schuster Inc. v. Members of N. Y. State Crime Victims Bd. 502 U.S. 105 (1991)
  9. 2.04: Free Press- In Re- Grand Jury Subpoena Judith Miller 397 F.3d 964 (D.C. Cir. 2005)
  10. 2.05: Free Press- Beard v. Banks 548 U.S. 521 (2006)
  11. 2.06: Free Press- Pell v. Procunier 417 U.S. 817 (1974)
  12. 2.07: Freedom of Religion- Cooper v. Pate
  13. 2.08: Freedom of Religion- OLone v. Estate of Shabazz 482 U.S. 342 (1987)
  14. 2.09: Freedom of Religion- McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Ky.
  15. 2.10: Freedom to Assembly- Brandenburg v. Ohio 395 U.S. 444 (1969)
  16. 2.11: Freedom of Assembly- National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie 432 U.S. 43 (1977)
  17. 2.12: Freedom of Speech- Schenck v. United States 249 U.S. 47 (1919)
  18. 2.13: Freedom of Speech- Dennis v. United States 341 U.S. 494 (1951)
  19. 2.14: Freedom of Speech- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District 393 U.S. 503 (1969)
  20. 03: Second Amendment- Regulations
  21. 3.01: Military Service- United States v. Cruikshank 92 U.S. 542 (1875)
  22. 3.02: Military Service- United States v. Miller 307 U.S. 174 (1939)
  23. 3.03: Military Service- District of Columbia v. Heller 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Annotate this Case
  24. 3.04: Federal Regulations v. State Regulations- Presser v. Illinois 116 U.S. 252 (1886)
  25. 3.05: Federal Regulation v. State Regulation- McDonald v. Chicago 561 U.S. 742 (2010)
  26. 04: Fourth Amendment and the Exclusionary Rule
  27. 4.01: Weeks v. United States 232 U.S. 383 (1914)
  28. 4.02: Mapp v. Ohio 367 U.S. 643 (1961) Annotate this Case
  29. 4.03: Wolf v. Colorado 338 U.S. 25 (1949)
  30. 4.04: Schmerber v. California 384 U.S. 757 (1966)
  31. 4.05: Sibron v. New York 392 U.S. 40 (1968)
  32. 4.06: Illinois v. Gates 462 U.S. 213 (1983)
  33. 4.07: Utah v. Strieff 579 US (2016)
  34. 4.08: Carroll v. United States 267 U.S. 132 (1925)
  35. 05: Exceptions to the Fourth Amendment
  36. 5.01: US v. Jones 565 US (2012)
  37. 5.02: Carroll v. United States 267 U.S. 132 (1925)
  38. 5.03: Kyllo v. United States 533 U.S. 27 (2001)
  39. 5.04: Brendlin v. California 551 U.S. 249 (2007)
  40. 5.05: Rodriguez v. US 575 US (2015)
  41. 5.06: US v. Leon 468 US 897 (1984)
  42. 5.07: Amos v. United States 255 U.S. 313 (1921)
  43. 5.08: Johnson v. United States 333 U.S. 10 (1948) Annotate this Case
  44. 5.09: Bumper v. North Carolina 391 US 543 (1968)
  45. 5.10: Chimel v. California 395 US 752 (1969)
  46. 5.11: New York v. Belton 453 U.S. 454 (1981)
  47. 5.12: Florida v. Riley 488 US 445 (1989)
  48. 5.13: Terry v. Ohio 392 US 1 (1968)
  49. 5.14: Hester v. United States 413 US 266 (1973)
  50. 5.15: Arizona v. Gant 556 U.S. 332 (2009)
  51. 06: Wiretapping- What is permissible
  52. 6.01: Olmstead v. United Stated 277 US 438 (1928)
  53. 6.02: Berger v. NY 388 US 41 (1967)
  54. 6.03: Katz v. United states 389 US 347 (1967)
  55. 6.04: Clapper v. Amnesty Intl USA 568 US (2013)
  56. 07: Self Incrimination and the 5th amendment
  57. 7.01: Bram v. US 168 US 532 (1897)
  58. 7.02: Spano v. NY 360 US 315 (1959)
  59. 7.03: Frazier v. Cupp 394 US 731 (1969)
  60. 7.04: Arizona v. Fulminante 499 US 279 (1991)
  61. 7.05: Berghuis v. Thompkins 560 U.S. 370 (2010)
  62. 7.06: Salinas v. Texas 570 US (2013)
  63. 7.07: Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (1966)
  64. 7.08: Schmerber v. California 384 US 757 (1966)
  65. 08: 6th amendment What is effective representation
  66. 8.01: Powell v. Alabama 287 US 45 (1932)
  67. 8.02: Gideon v. Wainwright 372 US 335 (1963)
  68. 8.03: Texas v. Cobb 532 US 162 (2001)
  69. 8.04: Escobedo v. Illinois 378 US 478 (1964)
  70. 8.05: Montejo v. Louisiana 556 US 778 (2009)
  71. 09: Discrimination in the Constitution Due Process and the 14th Amendment
  72. 9.01: Dred Scott v. Sandford 60 US 393 (1856)
  73. 9.02: Plessy v. Ferguson 163 US 537 (1896)
  74. 9.03: Korematsu v. US 323 US 214 (1944)
  75. 9.04: Brown v. Board of Ed 347 US 483 (1954
  76. 9.05: Loving v. Virginia 388 US 1 (1967)
  77. 9.06: Roe v. Wade 410 US 113 (1973)
  78. 9.07: Obergefell v. Hodges 576 US (2015)
  79. 10: Punishment and the 8th amendment- What constitutes cruel and unusual punishment
  80. 10.01: Ex Parte Hull 312 US 546 (1941)
  81. 10.02: Furman v. Georgia 408 US 238 (1972)
  82. 10.03: Coker v. Georgia 433 US 584 (1977)
  83. 10.04: Kennedy v. Louisana 554 US 407 (2008)
  84. 10.05: Miller v. Alabama 567 US (2012)
  85. 10.06: Ex Parte Hull 312 US 546 (1941)
  86. 10.07: In Re Bonner 151 US 242 (1894)
  87. 10.08: 11.7-
  88. 10.09: Ruffin v. Commmonwealth 62 Va 790 (1871)
  89. 10.10: Price v. Johnston 334 US 266 (1948)
  90. 11: Trial Rights- Understanding the rights of a defendant
  91. 11.01: Batson v. Kentucky 476 US 79 (1986)
  92. 11.02: Griffin v. California 380 US 609(1965)
  93. 11.03: In re Gault 387 U.S. 1 (1967
  94. 11.04: Crawford v. Washington 541 US 36 (2004)
  95. 11.05: Maryland v. Craig 497 US 836 (1990)
  96. 11.06: Waller v. Georgia 467 US 39 (1984)
  97. 11.07: Estes v. Texas 381 US 532 (1965)
  98. 12: Social Media and the Constitution- Exploring the limitations
  99. 12.01: Elonis v. US 575 US (2015)
  100. 12.02: Riley v. California 573 US (2014)
  101. 12.03: US v. Lambis SDNY 7
  102. 12.3.01: US v. Lambis SDNY 7 2016.not found